Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuhn, G
dc.contributor.authorPailhès, A
dc.contributor.authorJay, J
dc.contributor.authorLukian, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T10:28:52Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T10:28:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-16
dc.identifier.issn2325-9965
dc.identifier.issn2325-9973
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21727
dc.description.abstract

Magic is an art form that allows us to experience the impossible, but some magic tricks are more implausible than others. We present two experiments that examined whether the objective probability of a trick occurring by chance influences how people experience the trick. In Experiment 1, participants watched different versions of a magic trick in which we manipulated the statistical probability of the trick occurring by chance. We found that the objective probability had no significant impact on how much people enjoyed the trick or how impressed they were by it. Our participants enjoyed the trick equally when there was a 25% chance of it succeeding by chance as when it was virtually impossible. The same was true for how impressed they were by the performance. However, tricks that were less likely to succeed by chance were rated as more difficult and impossible. More implausible tricks resulted in more participant explanations stating they did not know how the trick was done, as well as explanations implying it was fake. In a follow-up experiment, participants were presented with vignettes describing the same trick, and they were asked to judge the magician’s chances of succeeding. The statistical probability of the trick occurring by chance did not affect these judgments adversely, but they did do so when the same feat was performed by a nonmagician.

dc.languageen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA)
dc.subjectmagic
dc.subjectemotions
dc.subjectevent perception
dc.subjectprobability
dc.titleExperiencing the improbable: How does the objective probability of a magic trick occurring influence a spectator’s experience?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
dc.typeEarly Access
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dec0000220
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalDecision
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/dec0000220
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-07-10
dc.date.updated2023-11-28T10:28:44Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-12-6
dc.identifier.eissn2325-9973
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1037/dec0000220


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV