Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRhodes, J
dc.contributor.authorBlakeley-Glover, J
dc.contributor.authorMiller, A
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A
dc.contributor.authorRochmankowski, I
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T12:52:08Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T12:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21479
dc.description.abstract

In the initial study, two focus groups (n=11) scrutinized the five domains within the Inner Development Goals (IDG) framework, examining the essential skills for tackling challenging goals. They collaboratively crafted a streamlined 29-item measure (IDG-A), incorporating a novel sixth domain: organizational belonging. The second study assessed the IDG-A among employees from four organizations (n=39), exploring correlations between the 29 items, six domains, and overall scores. Significantly, many items, nearly all domains, and all domains in relation to the composite score exhibited meaningful correlations, suggesting strong single conceptual alignment. The third study employed findings from the first, leveraging the conceptual congruence of these domains, and motivational theories to shape the Meaning, Awareness, Purpose (MAP) model, designed to activate individuals for climate change goals by taking up climate action, and improving well-being. To assess MAP's effectiveness, two global organizations recruited employees interested in climate change, who underwent IDG-A assessments and were divided into a Carbon Literacy Training (CLT) group (n=10) who dissected strategies for climate action and created a project, or the MAP condition (n=6) emphasizing intrinsic motivation and merging individual and team climate actions to enhance well-being and communication. CLT involved a 15-hour course over 10 weeks, while MAP spanned 9 hours over 10 weeks. Post-intervention, both groups underwent IDG-A re-evaluation and interviews to gauge climate action engagement. Baseline IDG-A scores showed no group differences, with CLT showing no significant improvement. Conversely, MAP significantly improved (p=.004) and outperformed CLT (p=0.03). Interviews indicated personal changes for all, but uniquely, MAP reported enhanced team cohesion and improved well-being. In conclusion, this study proposes future research directions and practical applications.

dc.titleInner Development Goals and the Meaning, Awareness and Purpose (MAP) Model for Climate Coaching
dc.typejournal-article
plymouth.journalJournal of Mental Health and Climate Change
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.8320461
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-05
dc.date.updated2023-10-23T12:52:07Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-10-24
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.5281/zenodo.8320461


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV