Organizational perspectives on outdoor talking therapy: Towards a position of ‘environmental safe uncertainty’

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>There is growing support within the therapy professions for using talking therapy in alternative environments, such as outdoor spaces. The aim of the present study was to further understand how the organizational culture in clinical psychology may prevent or enable practitioners to step outside the conventional indoor consulting room.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Informed grounded theory methodology was used within a pragmatist philosophy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Participants (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 15; nine male, six female) were identified using theoretical sampling. The sample consisted of experts and leaders within the profession of clinical psychology (e.g., heads of services, training programme directors, chairs of professional bodies, and developers of therapy models; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> years in the profession = 34.80, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 9.77). One‐to‐one interviews and analysis ran concurrently over 9 months (April–December 2020). Mason’s model of safe uncertainty was drawn upon to illuminate and organize themes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The main themes comprised organizational factors that either support a practitioner in maintaining a position of curiosity and flexibility towards the environment where therapy is located (‘environmental safe uncertainty’), or push them towards adopting a more fixed position (‘environmental certainty’). Themes included influences from therapy traditions, accessibility of alternative environments, internalized risk, workplace subcultures, business models, biomedical approaches, and the COVID‐19 pandemic.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Whether therapy is located in a consulting room, outdoors, clients’ homes, or digitally, practitioners, clients, and services are encouraged to maintain a position of environmental safe uncertainty.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Practitioner Points</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list list-type="bullet">

<jats:list-item><jats:p>The therapy process and outcomes are influenced by the physical environment in which talking therapy is situated.</jats:p></jats:list-item>

<jats:list-item><jats:p>Practitioners have often remained fixed in their preferred therapy environment, such as the indoor consulting room, without exploring the potential benefits of alternative environments or involving the client in this decision‐making (i.e., ‘environmental certainty’).</jats:p></jats:list-item>

<jats:list-item><jats:p>Outdoor environments, as well as other alternatives to the consulting room (e.g., digital, home visits, and public places), can support access to therapy, subsequent engagement, and therefore health care equity.</jats:p></jats:list-item>

<jats:list-item><jats:p>Practitioners and clients are encouraged to adopt a position of ‘environmental safe uncertainty’, which is defined as having openness, critical curiosity, and collaboration regarding the therapy environment and the possibility of other environments being more conducive to therapy.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p></jats:sec>