The efficacy of therapist-supported acceptance and commitment therapy-based bibliotherapy for psychological distress after stroke: a single-case multiple-baseline study
dc.contributor.author | Gladwyn-Khan, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, R | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-17T14:58:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-17T14:58:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10-10 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1833 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1833 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19701 | |
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec id="S135246582200042X_as1"> <jats:title>Background:</jats:title> <jats:p>Psychological distress is common after stroke, and affects recovery. However, there are few evidence-based psychological treatments. This study evaluates a bibliotherapy-based approach to its amelioration.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S135246582200042X_as2"> <jats:title>Aims:</jats:title> <jats:p>To investigate a stroke-specific self-management book, based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), as a therapist-supported intervention for psychological distress after stroke.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S135246582200042X_as3"> <jats:title>Method:</jats:title> <jats:p>The design was a single case, randomised non-concurrent multiple-baseline design (MBD). Sixteen stroke survivors, eight males and eight females (mean age 60.6 years), participated in an MBD with three phases: A (randomised-duration baseline); B (intervention); and follow-up (at 3 weeks). During the baseline, participants received therapist contact only. In the bibliotherapy intervention, participants received bi-weekly therapist support. The primary measures of psychological distress (General Health Questionaire-12; GHQ-12) and quality of life (Satisfaction with Life Scale; SWLS) were completed weekly. Secondary measures of mood, wellbeing and illness impact were completed pre- and post-intervention.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S135246582200042X_as4"> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>Omnibus whole-group TAU-U analysis was statistically significant for each primary measure with a moderate effect size on both (0.6 and 0.3 for GHQ-12 and SWLS, respectively). Individual TAU-U analyses demonstrated that the majority of individuals exhibited positive change. All the secondary measures showed significant pre–post improvements. Eighty-one per cent of participants reported the book was helpful and 81% also found the ACT-based sections helpful. Relative risk calculations showed finding the book helpful was associated with improvement in GHQ-12 and SWLS scores.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S135246582200042X_as5"> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>ACT-based bibliotherapy, with therapist support, is a promising intervention for psychological difficulties after stroke.</jats:p> </jats:sec> | |
dc.format.extent | 87-104 | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | |
dc.subject | acceptance and commitment therapy | |
dc.subject | bibliotherapy | |
dc.subject | self-management | |
dc.subject | stroke | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy | |
dc.subject | Quality of Life | |
dc.subject | Psychological Distress | |
dc.subject | Stroke | |
dc.title | The efficacy of therapist-supported acceptance and commitment therapy-based bibliotherapy for psychological distress after stroke: a single-case multiple-baseline study | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36214628 | |
plymouth.issue | 1 | |
plymouth.volume | 51 | |
plymouth.publisher-url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s135246582200042x | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/s135246582200042x | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dc.publisher.place | United States | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-08-18 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-10-25 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-1833 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1017/s135246582200042x | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |