Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCrory, M
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, DF
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RC
dc.contributor.authorNoad, RF
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T09:56:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-12
dc.identifier.issn0960-2011
dc.identifier.issn1464-0694
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19542
dc.description.abstract

Post stroke anxiety is associated with reduced quality of life, worse rehabilitation outcomes and poor social functioning in stroke survivors. Despite its clinical relevance, there are a lack of screening tools to identify post-stroke anxiety. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) are the only self-report screening test for anxiety validated in stroke patients. However, both of these measures have limitations associated with their clinical utility, length of time to administer and cost to purchase. This study aimed to assess the classiciation accuracy of a freely available and shorter alternative, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) for use in the acute stroke setting. This study used retrospective analysis of a sequential sample in a clinical database of mood and cognitive scores. Patients' scores on the GAD-2 and HADS-A were compared. The GAD-2 demonstrated strong convergent validity with the HADS-A and good specificity and sensitivity for clinical anxiety. In conclusion, the GAD-2 may be a useful screening assessment of post-stroke anxiety in the acute setting; however, it should be used with due consideration of the methodological limitations of this study.

dc.format.extent1-17
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectScreening
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.subjectValidation
dc.subjectGAD-2
dc.titleEvaluating the GAD-2 to screen for post-stroke anxiety on an acute stroke unit
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35152850
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume33
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2022.2030366
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09602011.2022.2030366
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-11
dc.rights.embargodate2023-2-12
dc.identifier.eissn1464-0694
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/09602011.2022.2030366
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV