Evaluating the impact of a UK recovery college on mental well-being: pre- and post-intervention study

Abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472423006464_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Recovery colleges provide personalised educational mental health support for people who self-refer. The research evidence supporting them is growing, with key components and the positive experiences of attendees reported. However, the quantitative outcome evidence and impact on economic outcomes is limited.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006464_sec_a2"> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>To evaluate the impact of attending a UK recovery college for students who receive a full educational intervention.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006464_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>This is a pre- and post-intervention study, with predominantly quantitative methods. Participants recruited over an 18-month period (01.2020–07.2021) completed self-reported well-being (Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS)) and recovery (Process of Recovery (QPR)) surveys, and provided details and evidence of employment and educational status. Descriptive statistics for baseline data and Shapiro–Wilk, Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>-tests were used to compare pre- and post-intervention scores, with Hedges’ <jats:italic>g</jats:italic>-statistic as a measure of effect size. Medical records were reviewed and a brief qualitative assessment of changes reported by students was conducted.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006464_sec_a4" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Of 101 student research participants, 84 completed the intervention. Well-being (mean SWEMWBS scores 17.3 and 21.9; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 80) and recovery (mean QPR scores 27.2 and 38.8; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 75) improved significantly (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001; Hedges’ <jats:italic>g</jats:italic> of 1.08 and 1.03). The number of economically inactive students reduced from 53 (69%) to 19 (24.4%). No research participants were referred for specialist mental health support while students. ‘Within-self’ and ‘practical’ changes were described by students following the intervention.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006464_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Findings detail the largest self-reported pre–post data-set for students attending a recovery college, and the first data detailing outcomes of remote delivery of a recovery college.</jats:p> </jats:sec>